Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

He agrees with the report of the Committee recommended for publication in Proceedings. Parts of Knobel's report should be communicated to the author.

Subject: Astronomy

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1897].

Reference number
RR/13/229
Earliest possible date
28 June 1897
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edwin Bailey Elliott

View page for Edwin Bailey Elliott

Use this record

Citation

Edwin Bailey Elliott, Letter from Edwin Bailey Elliott, on a paper 'A Maya calendar inscription, interpreted by Goodman's tables' by Alfred Percival Maudslay to the Secretary of the Royal Society, 28 June 1897, RR/13/229, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_13_229/letter-from-edwin-bailey-elliott-on-a-paper-a-maya-calendar-inscription-interpreted-by-goodmans-tables-by-alfred-percival-maudslay-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society, accessed on 25 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_13_229/letter-from-edwin-bailey-elliott-on-a-paper-a-maya-calendar-inscription-interpreted-by-goodmans-tables-by-alfred-percival-maudslay-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society" title="Letter from Edwin Bailey Elliott, on a paper 'A Maya calendar inscription, interpreted by Goodman's tables' by Alfred Percival Maudslay to the Secretary of the Royal Society" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection