Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, though not in its current state.. The titles of some of the chapters should be changed and the third part should be rearranged. Some of the points that were included in the abstract should be added.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1897].

Reference number
RR/13/143
Earliest possible date
20 May 1896
Physical description
Report on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Francis Gotch

View page for Francis Gotch

Use this record

Citation

Francis Gotch, Referee's report by Francis Gotch, on a Croonian Lecture 'Observations on isolated nerve (with particular reference to carbon dioxide)' by Augustus Desire Waller, 20 May 1896, RR/13/143, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_13_143/referees-report-by-francis-gotch-on-a-croonian-lecture-observations-on-isolated-nerve-with-particular-reference-to-carbon-dioxide-by-augustus-desire-waller, accessed on 15 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_13_143/referees-report-by-francis-gotch-on-a-croonian-lecture-observations-on-isolated-nerve-with-particular-reference-to-carbon-dioxide-by-augustus-desire-waller" title="Referee's report by Francis Gotch, on a Croonian Lecture 'Observations on isolated nerve (with particular reference to carbon dioxide)' by Augustus Desire Waller" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection