Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

He has enclosed his paper. He believes it should be printed in Philosophical Transactions due to its size and illustrations. The paper has already been delayed by many months, 'owing to uncertainty as to the future of Phil[osophical] Trans[actions]'. The paper should be read at an early meeting of the Society.

Subject: Botany

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1895].

Reference number
RR/13/11
Earliest possible date
13 October 1895
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Use this record

Citation

Letter from Frederick Orpen Bower, on his paper 'Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members. Part. II. Ophioglossaceae' to the Secretary of the Royal Society, 13 October 1895, RR/13/11, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_13_11/letter-from-frederick-orpen-bower-on-his-paper-studies-in-the-morphology-of-spore-producing-members-part-ii-ophioglossaceae-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society, accessed on 06 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_13_11/letter-from-frederick-orpen-bower-on-his-paper-studies-in-the-morphology-of-spore-producing-members-part-ii-ophioglossaceae-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society" title="Letter from Frederick Orpen Bower, on his paper 'Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members. Part. II. Ophioglossaceae' to the Secretary of the Royal Society" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection