Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. It is a advancement of current knowledge. The paper is not needlessly long or overly illustrated. The author should refer to the work of Sarart [?] in this area. Results have been accidentally attributed to the wrong person.

Subject: Physics

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1897].

Reference number
RR/13/106
Earliest possible date
June 1896
Physical description
Report on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Oliver Joseph Lodge

View page for Oliver Joseph Lodge

Use this record

Citation

Oliver Joseph Lodge, Referee's report by Oliver Joseph Lodge, on a paper 'A magnetic detector of electrical waves and some of its applications' by Ernest Rutherford, June 1896, RR/13/106, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_13_106/referees-report-by-oliver-joseph-lodge-on-a-paper-a-magnetic-detector-of-electrical-waves-and-some-of-its-applications-by-ernest-rutherford, accessed on 14 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_13_106/referees-report-by-oliver-joseph-lodge-on-a-paper-a-magnetic-detector-of-electrical-waves-and-some-of-its-applications-by-ernest-rutherford" title="Referee's report by Oliver Joseph Lodge, on a paper 'A magnetic detector of electrical waves and some of its applications' by Ernest Rutherford" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection