Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions.The experiments are ingenious and original and suggest that further research should be conducted into the subject.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1897].

Reference number
RR/13/105
Earliest possible date
03 October 1896
Physical description
Report on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Typescript

Creator name

James Crichton-Browne

View page for James Crichton-Browne

Use this record

Citation

James Crichton-Browne, Referee's report by James Crichton-Browne , on a paper 'Phenomena resulting from interruption of afferent and efferent tracts of the cerebellum' by J A Risien Russell, 03 October 1896, RR/13/105, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_13_105/referees-report-by-james-crichton-browne-on-a-paper-phenomena-resulting-from-interruption-of-afferent-and-efferent-tracts-of-the-cerebellum-by-j-a-risien-russell, accessed on 10 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_13_105/referees-report-by-james-crichton-browne-on-a-paper-phenomena-resulting-from-interruption-of-afferent-and-efferent-tracts-of-the-cerebellum-by-j-a-risien-russell" title="Referee's report by James Crichton-Browne , on a paper 'Phenomena resulting from interruption of afferent and efferent tracts of the cerebellum' by J A Risien Russell" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection