Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication but does not state in which journal. Cannot comment on the botanical parts, and the physical parts are only slight. Suggests the authors should have gone into more detail when describing their experiments. The physical parts are important and should be published. Suggests the opinion of a botanist be sought.

Subject: Botany

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1895]

Reference number
RR/12/90
Earliest possible date
20 February 1895
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Joseph John Thomson

View page for Joseph John Thomson

Use this record

Citation

Joseph John Thomson, Referee's report by Joseph John Thomson, on a paper 'On the ascent of sap' by Henry Horatio Dixon and John Joly, 20 February 1895, RR/12/90, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_12_90/referees-report-by-joseph-john-thomson-on-a-paper-on-the-ascent-of-sap-by-henry-horatio-dixon-and-john-joly, accessed on 15 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_12_90/referees-report-by-joseph-john-thomson-on-a-paper-on-the-ascent-of-sap-by-henry-horatio-dixon-and-john-joly" title="Referee's report by Joseph John Thomson, on a paper 'On the ascent of sap' by Henry Horatio Dixon and John Joly" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection