Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Returns author's response to criticisms. These were intended as suggestions for improvement, rather than essential criticisms, and their adoption is entirely up to the author. Makes some suggestions for the formulae and use of terms.

Subject: Applied Sciences

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1896]

Reference number
RR/12/330
Earliest possible date
15 July 1895
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
7 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici

View page for Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici

Use this record

Citation

Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici, Second referee's report by Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici, on a paper 'The kinematics of machines' by T A Hearson, 15 July 1895, RR/12/330, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_12_330/second-referees-report-by-olaus-magnus-friedrich-erdmann-henrici-on-a-paper-the-kinematics-of-machines-by-t-a-hearson, accessed on 09 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_12_330/second-referees-report-by-olaus-magnus-friedrich-erdmann-henrici-on-a-paper-the-kinematics-of-machines-by-t-a-hearson" title="Second referee's report by Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici, on a paper 'The kinematics of machines' by T A Hearson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection