Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. 'Perhaps I am prejudicial against him by the style of his letters to [Francis Galton], which are cantankerous, &, - considering whom he is addressing, - impertinent; but I really do not see that anything can be made of the [manuscript] without its being entirely & carefully re-written'. The author does not give any results of his experiments, and appears unfamiliar with physcho-physical laws. The author does not fully explain the new 'compulsory laws' which he has 'discovered'. 'Please don't divulge my name, or he will leave worrying Galton & fly at me'. Suggests leaving the diagrams at Burlington House or returning them to Herbert Rix.

Subject:

[Not published]

Reference number
RR/12/323
Earliest possible date
11 March 1895
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Venn

View page for John Venn

Use this record

Citation

John Venn, Referee's report by John Venn, on an unnamed paper by A L Haddon, 11 March 1895, RR/12/323, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_12_323/referees-report-by-john-venn-on-an-unnamed-paper-by-a-l-haddon, accessed on 18 April 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_12_323/referees-report-by-john-venn-on-an-unnamed-paper-by-a-l-haddon" title="Referee's report by John Venn, on an unnamed paper by A L Haddon" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection