Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'The latent heat of evaporation of water' by Ernest Howard Griffiths

Reference number: RR/12/322

Date: 1895

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Suggests some of the difficulties in taking small measurements of temperature would be remedied by using a method outlined in a paper published by the Physical Society.

Subject: Physics and Chemistry

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1895]

Reference number
RR/12/322
Earliest possible date
1895
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Schuster

View page for Arthur Schuster

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Schuster, Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'The latent heat of evaporation of water' by Ernest Howard Griffiths, 1895, RR/12/322, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_12_322/referees-report-by-arthur-schuster-on-a-paper-the-latent-heat-of-evaporation-of-water-by-ernest-howard-griffiths, accessed on 18 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_12_322/referees-report-by-arthur-schuster-on-a-paper-the-latent-heat-of-evaporation-of-water-by-ernest-howard-griffiths" title="Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'The latent heat of evaporation of water' by Ernest Howard Griffiths" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection