Referee's report by William de Wiveleslie Abney, on an unnamed paper by F W Edridge-Green
Reference number: RR/12/314
Date: 19 February 1894
Description
Not recommended for publication in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. The paper contains nothing new, and the measurements are misleading. The paper has the feeling of a letter to Nature, rather than a paper for the Royal Society journals.
Subject: Physiology
[Not published]
- Reference number
- RR/12/314
- Earliest possible date
- 19 February 1894
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 3 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
William de Wiveleslie Abney, Referee's report by William de Wiveleslie Abney, on an unnamed paper by F W Edridge-Green, 19 February 1894, RR/12/314, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_12_314/referees-report-by-william-de-wiveleslie-abney-on-an-unnamed-paper-by-f-w-edridge-green, accessed on 18 January 2025
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_12_314/referees-report-by-william-de-wiveleslie-abney-on-an-unnamed-paper-by-f-w-edridge-green
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_12_314/referees-report-by-william-de-wiveleslie-abney-on-an-unnamed-paper-by-f-w-edridge-green" title="Referee's report by William de Wiveleslie Abney, on an unnamed paper by F W Edridge-Green" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 12, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1893-1895 Reference number: RR/12
Related Fellows
-
William de Wiveleslie Abney
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection