Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The experimental methods are novel and the results important. Suggests reducing the size of the figures, and printing them as woodcuts.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1894]

Reference number
RR/12/217
Earliest possible date
10 March 1894
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer

View page for Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer

Use this record

Citation

Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer, Referee's report by Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer, on a paper 'Experimental researches into the functions of the cerebellum' by J S Risien Russell, 10 March 1894, RR/12/217, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_12_217/referees-report-by-edward-albert-sharpey-schafer-on-a-paper-experimental-researches-into-the-functions-of-the-cerebellum-by-j-s-risien-russell, accessed on 17 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_12_217/referees-report-by-edward-albert-sharpey-schafer-on-a-paper-experimental-researches-into-the-functions-of-the-cerebellum-by-j-s-risien-russell" title="Referee's report by Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer, on a paper 'Experimental researches into the functions of the cerebellum' by J S Risien Russell" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection