Letter from William Chandler Roberts Austen, on a paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' by J H Hannay to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Reference number: RR/11/277
Date: 16 August 1893
Description
Not recommended for publication in Proceedings. There is nothing in the author's letter that would change his opinion.
Subject: Physics
[Not published].
- Reference number
- RR/11/277
- Earliest possible date
- 16 August 1893
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 2 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
William Chandler Roberts-Austen, Letter from William Chandler Roberts Austen, on a paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' by J H Hannay to the Secretary of the Royal Society, 16 August 1893, RR/11/277, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_11_277/letter-from-william-chandler-roberts-austen-on-a-paper-on-the-metallurgy-of-lead-by-j-h-hannay-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society, accessed on 13 December 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_11_277/letter-from-william-chandler-roberts-austen-on-a-paper-on-the-metallurgy-of-lead-by-j-h-hannay-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_11_277/letter-from-william-chandler-roberts-austen-on-a-paper-on-the-metallurgy-of-lead-by-j-h-hannay-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society" title="Letter from William Chandler Roberts Austen, on a paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' by J H Hannay to the Secretary of the Royal Society" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Records
-
Letter from George Gabriel Stokes, on a paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' by J H Hannay to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Creator: George Gabriel Stokes Reference number: RR/11/267 -
Letter from J H Hannay, on his paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Reference number: RR/11/268 -
Letter from J H Hannay, on his paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Reference number: RR/11/269 -
Letter from William Chandler Roberts Austen, on a paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' by J H Hannay to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Creator: William Chandler Roberts-Austen Reference number: RR/11/270 -
Referee's report by William Chandler Roberts Austen, on a paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' by J H Hannay
Creator: William Chandler Roberts-Austen Reference number: RR/11/271 -
Referee's report by Charles Romley Alder Wright, on a paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' by J H Hannay
Creator: Charles Romley Alder Wright Reference number: RR/11/272 -
Letter from William Chandler Roberts Austen, on a paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' by J H Hannay to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Creator: William Chandler Roberts-Austen Reference number: RR/11/273 -
Letter from J H Hannay, on his paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Reference number: RR/11/274 -
Letter from William Augustus Tilden, on a paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' by J H Hannay to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Creator: William Augustus Tilden Reference number: RR/11/275 -
Letter from William Augustus Tilden, on a paper 'On the metallurgy of lead' by J H Hannay to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Creator: William Augustus Tilden Reference number: RR/11/276 -
Unpublished paper, 'On the metallurgy of lead' by J B [James Ballantyne] Hannay
Creator: James Ballantyne Hannay Reference number: AP/69/9
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 11, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1891-1893 Reference number: RR/11
Related Fellows
-
William Chandler Roberts-Austen
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection