Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The problem that the author has focused on is of fundamental importance. The methods of experimentation are well-chosen and the work has been carried out with care and skill. The results 'contribute a substantial contribution to knowledge'.

Subject: Physics

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1894].

Reference number
RR/11/238
Earliest possible date
11 July 1893
Physical description
Report on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Carey Foster

View page for George Carey Foster

Use this record

Citation

George Carey Foster, Referee's report by George Carey Foster, on a paper 'On the ratio of the specific heats of the paraffins and their monohalogen derivatives' by J W Capstick, 11 July 1893, RR/11/238, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_11_238/referees-report-by-george-carey-foster-on-a-paper-on-the-ratio-of-the-specific-heats-of-the-paraffins-and-their-monohalogen-derivatives-by-j-w-capstick, accessed on 24 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_11_238/referees-report-by-george-carey-foster-on-a-paper-on-the-ratio-of-the-specific-heats-of-the-paraffins-and-their-monohalogen-derivatives-by-j-w-capstick" title="Referee's report by George Carey Foster, on a paper 'On the ratio of the specific heats of the paraffins and their monohalogen derivatives' by J W Capstick" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection