Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in Proceedings. The paper has not improved much since he gave his previous instructions. The chart should be published, although the author has 'no idea of their true meaning' and wouldn't be able to write an adequate description. If he had time, the referee would write one for him.

Subject: Engineering

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1892].

Reference number
RR/11/236bis
Earliest possible date
01 January 1894
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici

View page for Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici

Use this record

Citation

Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici, Referee's report by Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici, on a paper 'On the three-bar motion of watt' by William Brennand, 01 January 1894, RR/11/236bis, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_11_236bis/referees-report-by-olaus-magnus-friedrich-erdmann-henrici-on-a-paper-on-the-three-bar-motion-of-watt-by-william-brennand, accessed on 09 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_11_236bis/referees-report-by-olaus-magnus-friedrich-erdmann-henrici-on-a-paper-on-the-three-bar-motion-of-watt-by-william-brennand" title="Referee's report by Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici, on a paper 'On the three-bar motion of watt' by William Brennand" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection