Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The paper contains the 'most complete series of observations hitherto recorded in the development of the spores in the plants in question'.

Subject: Botany

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1894].

Reference number
RR/11/229
Earliest possible date
30 July 1893
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
8 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Dukinfield Henry Scott

View page for Dukinfield Henry Scott

Use this record

Citation

Dukinfield Henry Scott, Referee's report by Dukinfield Henry Scott, on a paper 'Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members.—Equisetineae and Lycopodinae' by Frederick Orpen Bower, 30 July 1893, RR/11/229, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_11_229/referees-report-by-dukinfield-henry-scott-on-a-paper-studies-in-the-morphology-of-spore-producing-membersequisetineae-and-lycopodinae-by-frederick-orpen-bower, accessed on 12 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_11_229/referees-report-by-dukinfield-henry-scott-on-a-paper-studies-in-the-morphology-of-spore-producing-membersequisetineae-and-lycopodinae-by-frederick-orpen-bower" title="Referee's report by Dukinfield Henry Scott, on a paper 'Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members.—Equisetineae and Lycopodinae' by Frederick Orpen Bower" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection