Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

He has had great difficulty trying to understand the paper, as it is 'so excessively technical'. Asks for someone else to be a referee.

Subject: Botany

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1894].

Reference number
RR/11/228
Earliest possible date
30 June 1893
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
7 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Turner Thiselton-Dyer

View page for William Turner Thiselton-Dyer

Use this record

Citation

William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, Referee's report by William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, on a paper 'Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members.—Equisetineae and Lycopodinae' by Frederick Orpen Bower, 30 June 1893, RR/11/228, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_11_228/referees-report-by-william-turner-thiselton-dyer-on-a-paper-studies-in-the-morphology-of-spore-producing-membersequisetineae-and-lycopodinae-by-frederick-orpen-bower, accessed on 17 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_11_228/referees-report-by-william-turner-thiselton-dyer-on-a-paper-studies-in-the-morphology-of-spore-producing-membersequisetineae-and-lycopodinae-by-frederick-orpen-bower" title="Referee's report by William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, on a paper 'Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members.—Equisetineae and Lycopodinae' by Frederick Orpen Bower" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection