Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

A point that was pointed out as incorrect in the referee report is actually correct, as he did not fully understand the point when he wrote the report.

Subject: Physics

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1892].

Reference number
RR/11/214
Earliest possible date
08 February 1892
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Davidson Niven

View page for William Davidson Niven

Use this record

Citation

William Davidson Niven, Letter from William Davidson Niven, on a paper 'Repulsion and rotation produced alternating electric currents' by Gilbert Thomas Walker to the Secretary of the Royal Society, 08 February 1892, RR/11/214, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_11_214/letter-from-william-davidson-niven-on-a-paper-repulsion-and-rotation-produced-alternating-electric-currents-by-gilbert-thomas-walker-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society, accessed on 23 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_11_214/letter-from-william-davidson-niven-on-a-paper-repulsion-and-rotation-produced-alternating-electric-currents-by-gilbert-thomas-walker-to-the-secretary-of-the-royal-society" title="Letter from William Davidson Niven, on a paper 'Repulsion and rotation produced alternating electric currents' by Gilbert Thomas Walker to the Secretary of the Royal Society" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection