Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Horace Lamb, on a paper 'Repulsion and rotation produced alternating electric currents' by Gilbert Thomas Walker

Reference number: RR/11/101

Date: 28 November 1891

Description

Is 'reluctant' to recommended the paper for publication in Philosophical Transactions.The examples used seem 'not very happily chosen'.

Subject: Physics

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1892].

Reference number
RR/11/101
Earliest possible date
28 November 1891
Physical description
Report on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Horace Lamb

View page for Horace Lamb

Use this record

Citation

Horace Lamb, Referee's report by Horace Lamb, on a paper 'Repulsion and rotation produced alternating electric currents' by Gilbert Thomas Walker, 28 November 1891, RR/11/101, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_11_101/referees-report-by-horace-lamb-on-a-paper-repulsion-and-rotation-produced-alternating-electric-currents-by-gilbert-thomas-walker, accessed on 12 November 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_11_101/referees-report-by-horace-lamb-on-a-paper-repulsion-and-rotation-produced-alternating-electric-currents-by-gilbert-thomas-walker" title="Referee's report by Horace Lamb, on a paper 'Repulsion and rotation produced alternating electric currents' by Gilbert Thomas Walker" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection