Referee's report by Charles William Wilson, on an untraced paper about the Great Pyramid by Captain Downing
Reference number: RR/10/340
Date: 15 April 1890
Description
Not recommended for publication in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. The method gives deceitful results.
Subject: Archaeology, Mathematics
[Publication status unknown - paper untraced]
- Reference number
- RR/10/340
- Earliest possible date
- 15 April 1890
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 2 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Charles William Wilson, Referee's report by Charles William Wilson, on an untraced paper about the Great Pyramid by Captain Downing, 15 April 1890, RR/10/340, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_340/referees-report-by-charles-william-wilson-on-an-untraced-paper-about-the-great-pyramid-by-captain-downing, accessed on 12 December 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_340/referees-report-by-charles-william-wilson-on-an-untraced-paper-about-the-great-pyramid-by-captain-downing
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10_340/referees-report-by-charles-william-wilson-on-an-untraced-paper-about-the-great-pyramid-by-captain-downing" title="Referee's report by Charles William Wilson, on an untraced paper about the Great Pyramid by Captain Downing" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 10, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1887-1890 Reference number: RR/10
Related Fellows
-
Charles William Wilson
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection