Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Has discussed the matter of publication with both referees and Olaus Magnus Friedrich Erdmann Henrici. The experiments are worthy of publication, but the conclusions are 'open to criticism'.

Subject: Physics and Chemistry, Applied Sciences

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', 1891]

Reference number
RR/10/333
Earliest possible date
15 October 1890
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Edward Ayrton

View page for William Edward Ayrton

Use this record

Citation

William Edward Ayrton, Referee's report by William Edward Ayrton, on a paper 'The rupture of steel by longitudinal stress' by Charles A Carus-Wilson, 15 October 1890, RR/10/333, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_333/referees-report-by-william-edward-ayrton-on-a-paper-the-rupture-of-steel-by-longitudinal-stress-by-charles-a-carus-wilson, accessed on 16 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10_333/referees-report-by-william-edward-ayrton-on-a-paper-the-rupture-of-steel-by-longitudinal-stress-by-charles-a-carus-wilson" title="Referee's report by William Edward Ayrton, on a paper 'The rupture of steel by longitudinal stress' by Charles A Carus-Wilson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection