Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

No clear statement regarding publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The species of bacteria investigated should be stated. Refers to work by Philippe Édouard Léon Van Tieghem, Fitz [?], Tranzmousti [?], Wortzmann [?] and Ferdinand Adolph Theophil Hueppe, whose work should be clearly referenced.

Subject: Botany

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', 1890]

Reference number
RR/10/243
Earliest possible date
12 April 1889
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edward Emanuel Klein

View page for Edward Emanuel Klein

Use this record

Citation

Edward Emanuel Klein, Referee's report by Edward Emanuel Klein, on a paper 'The ferment-action of bacteria' by Thomas Lauder Brunton and A Macfadyen, 12 April 1889, RR/10/243, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_243/referees-report-by-edward-emanuel-klein-on-a-paper-the-ferment-action-of-bacteria-by-thomas-lauder-brunton-and-a-macfadyen, accessed on 23 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10_243/referees-report-by-edward-emanuel-klein-on-a-paper-the-ferment-action-of-bacteria-by-thomas-lauder-brunton-and-a-macfadyen" title="Referee's report by Edward Emanuel Klein, on a paper 'The ferment-action of bacteria' by Thomas Lauder Brunton and A Macfadyen" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection