Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Refers to work of Mendelejiff [Dmitri Mendeleev] and Edmund James Mills. Gives a thorough mathematical criticism, and concludes that the author has not provided conclusive evidence to support their theories.

Subject: Mathematics, Physics

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', 1888]

Reference number
RR/10/226
Earliest possible date
24 July 1888
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
13 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Carey Foster

View page for George Carey Foster

Use this record

Citation

George Carey Foster, Referee's report by George Carey Foster, on a paper 'On the logarithmic law of atomic weights' by George Johnstone Stoney, 24 July 1888, RR/10/226, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_226/referees-report-by-george-carey-foster-on-a-paper-on-the-logarithmic-law-of-atomic-weights-by-george-johnstone-stoney, accessed on 13 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10_226/referees-report-by-george-carey-foster-on-a-paper-on-the-logarithmic-law-of-atomic-weights-by-george-johnstone-stoney" title="Referee's report by George Carey Foster, on a paper 'On the logarithmic law of atomic weights' by George Johnstone Stoney" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection