Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Has only been able to read the abstract, but based on that and the authors' pevious work, believes the paper will be a valuable one.

Subject: Physics and Chemistry

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1888]

Reference number
RR/10/190
Earliest possible date
14 March 1888
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Schuster

View page for Arthur Schuster

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Schuster, Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'On the ultra-violet spectra of the elements.–Part III. Cobalt and nickel' by George Downing Liveing and James Dewar, 14 March 1888, RR/10/190, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_190/referees-report-by-arthur-schuster-on-a-paper-on-the-ultra-violet-spectra-of-the-elementspart-iii-cobalt-and-nickel-by-george-downing-liveing-and-james-dewar, accessed on 21 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10_190/referees-report-by-arthur-schuster-on-a-paper-on-the-ultra-violet-spectra-of-the-elementspart-iii-cobalt-and-nickel-by-george-downing-liveing-and-james-dewar" title="Referee's report by Arthur Schuster, on a paper 'On the ultra-violet spectra of the elements.–Part III. Cobalt and nickel' by George Downing Liveing and James Dewar" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection