Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Has reconsidered and discussed the matter with Andrew Russell Forsyth. Are in general agreement, but still cannot recommend the paper.

Subject: Mathematics

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', 1888]

Reference number
RR/10/183
Earliest possible date
01 March 1888
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Cayley

View page for Arthur Cayley

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Cayley, Second referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on a paper 'On the direct application of first principles in the theory of partial differential equations' by Joseph Larmor, 01 March 1888, RR/10/183, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_183/second-referees-report-by-arthur-cayley-on-a-paper-on-the-direct-application-of-first-principles-in-the-theory-of-partial-differential-equations-by-joseph-larmor, accessed on 16 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10_183/second-referees-report-by-arthur-cayley-on-a-paper-on-the-direct-application-of-first-principles-in-the-theory-of-partial-differential-equations-by-joseph-larmor" title="Second referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on a paper 'On the direct application of first principles in the theory of partial differential equations' by Joseph Larmor" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection