Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Has examined the specimen preparations and the illustrations and finds them good, but does not consider the evidence demonstrative.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1888]

Reference number
RR/10/180
Earliest possible date
26 January 1888
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edwin Ray Lankester

View page for Edwin Ray Lankester

Use this record

Citation

Edwin Ray Lankester, Second referee's report by Edwin Ray Lankester, on a paper 'On the sexual cells and the early stages in the development of Millepora plicata' by Sydney John Hickson, 26 January 1888, RR/10/180, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_180/second-referees-report-by-edwin-ray-lankester-on-a-paper-on-the-sexual-cells-and-the-early-stages-in-the-development-of-millepora-plicata-by-sydney-john-hickson, accessed on 26 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10_180/second-referees-report-by-edwin-ray-lankester-on-a-paper-on-the-sexual-cells-and-the-early-stages-in-the-development-of-millepora-plicata-by-sydney-john-hickson" title="Second referee's report by Edwin Ray Lankester, on a paper 'On the sexual cells and the early stages in the development of Millepora plicata' by Sydney John Hickson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection