Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The results should be published separately from the description of the methodology. Suggests the author correct some errors in the text, and give a sufficient account of his methods.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1888]

Reference number
RR/10/179
Earliest possible date
30 December 1887
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
6 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Adam Sedgwick

View page for Adam Sedgwick

Use this record

Citation

Adam Sedgwick, Referee's report by Adam Sedgwick, on a paper 'On the sexual cells and the early stages in the development of Millepora plicata' by Sydney John Hickson, 30 December 1887, RR/10/179, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_179/referees-report-by-adam-sedgwick-on-a-paper-on-the-sexual-cells-and-the-early-stages-in-the-development-of-millepora-plicata-by-sydney-john-hickson, accessed on 21 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10_179/referees-report-by-adam-sedgwick-on-a-paper-on-the-sexual-cells-and-the-early-stages-in-the-development-of-millepora-plicata-by-sydney-john-hickson" title="Referee's report by Adam Sedgwick, on a paper 'On the sexual cells and the early stages in the development of Millepora plicata' by Sydney John Hickson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection