Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Isaac Bayley Balfour, on a paper 'A contribution to the study of the comparative anatomy of flowers' by G Henslow

Reference number: RR/10/177

Date: 02 February 1888

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'.

Subject: Botany

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', 1888]

Reference number
RR/10/177
Earliest possible date
02 February 1888
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Isaac Bayley Balfour

View page for Isaac Bayley Balfour

Use this record

Citation

Isaac Bayley Balfour, Referee's report by Isaac Bayley Balfour, on a paper 'A contribution to the study of the comparative anatomy of flowers' by G Henslow, 02 February 1888, RR/10/177, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_177/referees-report-by-isaac-bayley-balfour-on-a-paper-a-contribution-to-the-study-of-the-comparative-anatomy-of-flowers-by-g-henslow, accessed on 29 February 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10_177/referees-report-by-isaac-bayley-balfour-on-a-paper-a-contribution-to-the-study-of-the-comparative-anatomy-of-flowers-by-g-henslow" title="Referee's report by Isaac Bayley Balfour, on a paper 'A contribution to the study of the comparative anatomy of flowers' by G Henslow" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection