Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by John Hopkinson, on a paper 'Magnetic qualities of nickel (supplementary paper)' by James Alfred Ewing

Reference number: RR/10/150

Date: 20 July 1888

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Refers to work of Rowland. Suggests the author add an analysis of the samples.

Subject: Physics and Chemistry

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1888]

Reference number
RR/10/150
Earliest possible date
20 July 1888
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Hopkinson

View page for John Hopkinson

Use this record

Citation

John Hopkinson, Referee's report by John Hopkinson, on a paper 'Magnetic qualities of nickel (supplementary paper)' by James Alfred Ewing, 20 July 1888, RR/10/150, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_150/referees-report-by-john-hopkinson-on-a-paper-magnetic-qualities-of-nickel-supplementary-paper-by-james-alfred-ewing, accessed on 07 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10_150/referees-report-by-john-hopkinson-on-a-paper-magnetic-qualities-of-nickel-supplementary-paper-by-james-alfred-ewing" title="Referee's report by John Hopkinson, on a paper 'Magnetic qualities of nickel (supplementary paper)' by James Alfred Ewing" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection