Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. The paper might have been condensed, but it is not easy to suggest how this might be done. The theories put forward by the author are 'open to great uncertainty and doubt'.

Subject: Meteorology

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', 1888]

Reference number
RR/10/1
Earliest possible date
18 July 1881
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript
Related authors
Abercromby; Ralph (1842-1897); meteorologist

Creator name

Richard Strachey

View page for Richard Strachey

Use this record

Citation

Richard Strachey, Referee's report by Richard Strachey, on a paper 'On the relation between tropical and extra-tropical cyclones' by Ralph Abercromby, 18 July 1881, RR/10/1, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10_1/referees-report-by-richard-strachey-on-a-paper-on-the-relation-between-tropical-and-extra-tropical-cyclones-by-ralph-abercromby, accessed on 19 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10_1/referees-report-by-richard-strachey-on-a-paper-on-the-relation-between-tropical-and-extra-tropical-cyclones-by-ralph-abercromby" title="Referee's report by Richard Strachey, on a paper 'On the relation between tropical and extra-tropical cyclones' by Ralph Abercromby" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection