Referees' reports: volume 10, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
Reference number: RR/10
Date: 1887-1890
Description
Containing referee's reports arranged alphabetically by the lead author of the paper submitted to the Royal Society for review between 1887 and 1890.
Notable referees and authors include Arthur Schuster, Richard Owen, Thomas Henry Huxley and William Thomson, Baron Kelvin.
- Reference number
- RR/10
- Earliest possible date
- 1887-1890
- Physical description
- 3 Leather bound volumes, gilded title on spines
- Page extent
- Three volumes: reports 1-132; reports 133-263; reports 264-395
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Referees' reports: volume 10, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication, 1887-1890, RR/10, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10/referees-reports-volume-10-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication, accessed on 29 November 2023
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_10/referees-reports-volume-10-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_10/referees-reports-volume-10-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication" title="Referees' reports: volume 10, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Parent Records
This item is part of:
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1949
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection