Ronald Winckworth
Arthur Smith Woodward
Paper reference code: B.111 Estimates length of paper. Reports that [Herbert] J Fleure has been put forward as one referee, and [Henry] Balfour, [Charles Gabriel] Seligman, and [Wilfrid Edward] Le Gros Clark have been suggested as the second referee. Asks Woodward's opinion on this. Woodward recommends [Martin Alister Campbell] Hinton as the first referee, and Fleure as the second. [Not published in Royal Society journals, but printed as an occasional paper by the University of London Institute of Archaeology in 1939]. Received 6 February 1937
04 February 1937 Sender: Ronald Winckworth Reference number: RR/W/5/18
Paper reference code: B.117 Explains that the paper has been re-written based on comments from previous referees, [Henry] Woods, [Ernest William] MacBride, Woodward, and [David Meredith Seares] Watson. Reports that [Archibald Vivian] Hill has sent it to Watson. Woodward acknowledges the report and suggests MacBride as the second referee. [Not published]. Received 24 February 1937
18 February 1937 Sender: Ronald Winckworth Reference number: RR/W/5/28
Paper reference code: B.117 Refers to the previous version of the paper, which had received favourable reports from [Henry] Woods and [David Meredith Seares] Watson, and unfavourable ones from [Ernest William] MacBride and Woodward. Reports that the rewritten paper has been sent to Watson, who recommends it for publication in the Transactions [Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society], and MacBride, 'who is completely unfavourable'. Asks Woodward for advice on next steps. [Not published].
15 March 1937 Sender: Ronald Winckworth Reference number: RR/W/5/29